When it comes to things Islamic, one can get in trouble for quoting too much material from primary Islamic sources. Your book will get banned. Such is the case with Robert Spencer's The Truth About Muhammad. He writes:
1. "The Truth About Muhammad" details the triple choice that Muhammad directed his followers to offer to non-Muslims: conversion to Islam, subjugation without equality of rights with Muslims under the rule of Islamic law, or war. Did I fabricate this? No, it can be found in, among many other places, "Sahih Muslim", a collection of hadith – traditions of Muhammad and the early Muslims – that Muslims generally
consider reliable. In it, Muhammad says:
Fight
in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who
disbelieve in Allah….When you meet your enemies who are polytheists,
invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of
these, you also accept it and withold yourself from doing them any
harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it
from them and desist from fighting against them….If they refuse to
accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya [a special tax levied on
non-Muslims]. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off
your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight
them. (Sahih Muslim 4294)
Is "Sahih Muslim" banned in Pakistan? Of course not.
2.
In the book, I discuss how Muhammad’s earlier biographer, Ibn Ishaq,
explains the contexts of various verses of the Qur’an by saying that
Muhammad received revelations about warfare in three stages: first,
tolerance; then, defensive warfare; and finally, offensive warfare in
order to convert the unbelievers to Islam or make them pay the jizya
(see Qur’an 9:29). Qur’anic commentaries (tafasir) by
Ibn Kathir, Ibn Juzayy, As-Suyuti and others also emphasize that the
ninth chapter of the Qur’an, in which this call to offensive warfare
appears, abrogates every peace treaty in the Qur’an. I
didn’t just dig into old books to find this. In the modern age, this
idea of stages of development in the Qur’an’s teaching on jihad,
culminating in offensive warfare to establish the hegemony of Islamic
law, has been affirmed by the jihadist theorists Sayyid Qutb and Syed
Abul Ala Maududi, as well as the Pakistani Brigadier S. K. Malik
(author of "The Qur’anic Concept of War"), Saudi Chief Justice Sheikh Abdullah bin Muhammad bin Humaid (in his “Jihad in the Qur’an and Sunnah”),
and others. It is, of course, an assertion of no little concern to
non-Muslims, since it encapsulates a doctrine of warfare against
non-Muslims and their ultimate subjugation under Sharia rules, with all
that implies, and is being used by jihadists today in the Islamic world
to justify their actions and make new recruits.
Are the works of Ibn Kathir, Ibn Juzayy, As-Suyuti, Qutb, Maududi, Malik or Humaid banned in Pakistan? Of course not.
Read the whole article.