Or, put differently, you don't have to be a good businessman to be a good president. Peter Robinson, of the National Review, dissents from NR's endorsement of Mitt Romney saying:
This just in from Andy Ferguson, mainstay of The Weekly Standard and the author of one of the best books of 2007, Land of Lincoln: Adventures in Abe's America (if you have yet to read Land of Lincoln, be sure to buy a copy for your stocking):
Lincoln was a terrible manager and businessman who had at least two enterprises go bankrupt underneath him, probably three. There are several pages on the subject in…"Land of Lincoln."…[See] pages 172 - 174.
The idea that the dispositions and skills that make a man successful in business and money-making are somehow identical to, or even compatible with, the gifts that make a great democratic leader is simply preposterous. Would Ross Perot have been a good leader, or Henry Ford? Anyone who thinks this knows nothing of human nature, democratic politics, or corporate management. In my opinion.