William Lane Craig reports on recent activities in San Diego:
I presented a well-attended lecture on the question “Is Uncertainty a Sound Foundation for Religious Tolerance?” My target here was certain philosophers who claim that religious tolerance should be based on two factors: (1) our grasp of moral principles which state that persecution of other religions is wrong and (2) uncertainty that one’s own religion is true.
Such philosophers want to foster as much uncertainty about religious beliefs as they can and as much certainty about moral beliefs as they can as a way of increasing tolerance. I pointed out that this strategy backfires in a number of ways. In the first place, with respect to a religion like Christianity, which commands us to love our neighbor and even our enemy, it’s not uncertainty but certainty of that religion’s truth that will increase religious toleration. Fostering uncertainty about such a religion will actually decrease people’s motivation to be tolerant.
In fact, for any religion which sees morality as based in God, undermining people’s belief in God will undermine their confidence in the very moral principles which state that persecution is wrong!
In the second place, for people in many of the world religions, like Hinduism or Buddhism,
increasing their confidence in the truth of certain moral principles will actually falsify their religions. For these religions hold that moral values and the distinction between right and wrong belong to the realm of illusion. In reality, there is no distinction between good and evil: all is One.
So you can’t be a Hindu or a Buddhist or a Daoist and believe that persecution is really, objectively wrong. If you do believe that, you’ve falsified your religion. So you can’t hold to those religions (even with uncertainty) and believe in the moral principle of tolerance. So this approach is really quite hopeless.
Me: I've got to give more thought to this. I can see problems with Craig's proposal, or at the least, lots of areas that need development. I also want to work through George Weigle's recent elucidation and discussion of the Pope's lecture at Regensburg which Weigle offered at a "Dialog of Cultures" conference. Weigle engages the nature of Islam in that address and the challenges to freedom of religion that it poses.