- Update 2/26/08 - The Asian Times columnist, Spengler [a pseudonym], contends that looking closely at Obama's women (his mother and his wife), will tell you a lot about him: namely, a hatred for America. Spengler offers an approach and information you won't find elsewhere. Also, note this:
Listening to Obama speak, Sinclair Lewis'
cynical tent-revivalist Elmer Gantry comes to mind, or, even better, Tyrone
Power's portrayal of a carnival mentalist in the 1947 film noire "Nightmare Alley.
" The latter is available for instant viewing at Netflix, and highly recommended
as an antidote to having felt uplifted by an Obama speech.
. . . In times of stress
they(Americans) have a baleful susceptibility to hucksters and conmen.
Be afraid - be very afraid. America is at a low point in its fortunes, and
feeling sorry for itself. When Barack utters the word "hope", they instead
hear, "handout". A cynic might translate the national motto, E pluribus unum,
as "something for nothing". Now that the stock market and the housing market
have failed to give Americans something for nothing, they want something for
nothing from the government. The trouble is that he who gets something for
nothing will earn every penny of it, twice over.
(HT: Lisa Schiffren over at the Corner)
- Update 2/20/08 - Robert J. Samuelson, writes (in the Washington Post), about "The Obama Delusion."
Repudiating racism is not a magic cure-all for the nation's ills. The
task requires independent ideas, and Obama has few. If you examine his
agenda, it is completely ordinary, highly partisan, not candid and
mostly unresponsive to many pressing national problems. . . . He seems to have hypnotized much of the media and the public with his
eloquence and the symbolism of his life story. The result is a mass
delusion that Obama is forthrightly engaging the nation's major
problems when, so far, he isn't. (more)
- Update 2/19/08 - David Brooks takes a look at the fervor and asks a lot of questions including the following:
Obama says he is practicing a new kind of politics, but why has his PAC
sloshed $698,000 to the campaigns of the superdelegates, according to
the Center for Responsive Politics? Is giving Robert Byrd’s campaign
$10,000 the kind of change we can believe in?
If he values independent thinking, why is his the most predictable
liberal vote in the Senate? A People for the American Way computer
program would cast the same votes for cheaper. (more)
- Yes, his speeches can be oratorical works of art, and even mesmerizing, but might they also be a tad unrealistic? Big time. Even scary? I think so. Charles Krauthammer notes the fervor and tries to bring a little reality to bear. See also my previous post on Michelle Obama who can be scary also.