Michael Gerson brings us up to speed on research experiments.
. . . It is typical work for Andrew Newberg of the University of Pennsylvania
School of Medicine
-- perhaps the nation's leading expert on the
biological basis for religious experience. More exotic subjects of his
brain scans have been nuns at prayer, Buddhist monks during meditation,
Pentecostals speaking in tongues and entranced Brazilian mystics who
write out messages from the other side.
These subjects have little in common theologically. But the activity of the brain during intense religious experiences is often (though not always) similar. The frontal lobes are activated, indicating attention and focus. The thalamus shuts down normal sensory input. And the parietal lobes -- which ground us in time and space -- are less active. In this state, people describe a sense of timelessness, a suspension of self, a feeling of bliss and oneness with the universe.
Keep reading...
Before I reproduce more of Mike Gerson's article, I might interject that Andrew Newberg has written a number of books. Amazon lists them here. But, to continue..
What Newberg reveals through what is called single photon emission
computed tomography is not religion but the physical basis for the
feeling of transcendence. Meditation appears to
heighten this
experience over time. But it can also come in milder degrees through
rituals of communal worship -- smelling incense, drinking wine, viewing
images such as the cross, repeating words, standing, sitting, singing
in unison. Or this sense of oneness can be encouraged through the
secular rituals of the military -- drumming, walking in cadence, a
strict and rhythmic schedule. "All these stimuli have an impact on the
brain," Newberg argues. "They drive ideals into the whole body."
Drugs such as Lexapro or peyote have effects that overlap with spiritual experience, but they flood and excite the whole brain while meditation lights up only those portions that encourage the feeling of transcendence. This feeling can also be generated by intense personal suffering, or even by a stroke in certain portions of the brain. (Jill Bolte Taylor's recent, remarkable book, "My Stroke of Insight," tells how her painful stroke also produced an extraordinary sense of euphoria and purpose.)
For individuals, this pioneering research brings bad news and good news. Some people, it turns out, are probably less open to these experiences for genetic reasons. But the brain is more like a muscle than a computer. The spiritual facility can be developed -- and it changes over our lifetimes, as our brains age. In this narrow sense, prayer and meditation work in the same way that aerobic training works on the heart muscle.
For societies, this biological basis for spirituality provides an explanation for the universality and persistence of religion. Human beings routinely have experiences that are not commonly associated with normal consciousness yet seem more real than normal consciousness. "There is something in the brain that facilitates and rewards that type of experience," Newberg says, "and our brain desires to make sense of it."
This leads some, of course, to reductionism -- the assertion that a physical basis for transcendent experience proves there is no such thing as transcendence. It is an evolutionary joke on humanity -- perhaps useful, but not accurate -- because everything explainable is thus illusory.
But this view is not more "scientific" than other views. It involves a philosophic materialism that is entirely faith-based. We know, for example, that a complex series of physical, hormonal changes helps bond a mother to her newborn child. Does this mean that parental love is a myth? Only according to the philosophic claim that chemicals exhaust reality. Is it not equally possible that a cosmos charged with transcendence might organize itself in such a way that human beings can sense transcendence?
We have seen this debate before. Sigmund Freud believed that a deep, psychological desire for God proved that God is an illusion -- merely the projection of our deepest wishes into an empty universe. But the intensity of a desire or an experience does not make it a lie. And perhaps the frontal lobes and the thalamus and the parietal lobes are responding to a reality, not conjuring it.