Update 1/29/09 - Amir Tahiri calls it a "Pathetic 'Message'" Excerpt:
. . . For the first time, the question of democracy is top of the political agenda in virtually every Muslim state.
Obama should remember that he is the president of the United States - not
an impartial broker. It was unfortunate that he described himself as a
bridge. For a bridge has no personality of its own and cares little
about who might cross it and in which direction.
IF this was meant as the first direct contact between Obama and the
Mus lim world, the Al-Arabiya interview must be rated as a missed
opportunity.
Obama's remarks about the Israel-Palestine issue were so trite as
to merit no analysis. He said he was sending former Sen. George
Mitchell to listen to all sides - as if the world has not been hearing
their stories for more than six decades.
The president appeared apologetic, offering no hope for
democratization and economic development. He made no mention of the
economic meltdown that is creating unprecedented mass unemployment in
many countries of the region.
Nor did he offer any support to democratic forces facing crucial
elections in Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, the Palestinian
territories, Egypt and Algeria this year.
He had nothing to say about the thousands of Iranian workers who
have been thrown into prison solely because they created independent
trade unions. Nor did he mention Iranian women's courageous "a million
signatures campaign" or the series of student revolts that have been
crushed by the mullahs with exceptional violence.
Nor was there any nod toward reformers in Saudi Arabia and Egypt or
the heroic Lebanese democratic leaders who are fighting to preserve
their nation's independence from Iran and Syria.
Obama didn't call for the release of the tens of thousands of
political prisoners held in more than two dozen Muslim countries or a
moratorium on executions that each year cost the lives of hundreds of
dissidents.
CASTING himself in the role of a "bridge" and dreaming of a return
to an illusionary past, Obama appeared unsure of his own identity and
confused about the role that America should play in global politics.
And that is bad news for those who believe that the United States
should use its moral, economic and political clout in support of
democratic forces throughout the world. Read the whole thing
(Original post) -Full transcript here. Ed Morrissey explains why he calls it "a charming and dangerous naivete." Victor Davis Hanson offers his own thoughts. And Krauthammer had this to say: