Herewith the Family Research Council's response:
"Same-sex 'marriage' continues to be a movement driven by a liberal judicial elite determined to destroy not only the institution of marriage, but democracy as well. The casual dismissal of the facts of human biology and thousands of years of human history, simply to pander to a small band of social radicals, is bizarre and indefensible," said Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council (FRC).
Perkins pointed out that while four states have attempted to legalize same-sex "marriage" through the judicial process, to date none have done so democratically, while a majority of states have not only defined marriage as the union of one man and one woman, but have placed that definition in their state constitution. "We need to remember that the marriage amendment movement has
been many times more successful than
the same-sex 'marriage' movement," Perkins said. "FRC will continue to
stand with those states which are seeking to pass marriage protection
amendments in order to protect our most fundamental social institution
from the kind of judicial activism we saw today in Iowa."
"We
urge Iowans to contact their legislators and urge them to move quickly
to pass a constitutional amendment protecting marriage, joining the
twenty-nine states that have already defined marriage as the union of
one man and one woman in their state constitutions," stated Mr. Perkins.
"We
hope the legislature will heed the powerful swell of statewide support
for an amendment and reclaim from the High Court its rightful place as
the state's policy making body. That's the only sure way to protect the
institution of marriage from radical social engineering by state
judges."
was the fourth in
favor of legalizing same-sex "marriage" by a state high court.
California's ruling was overturned by the people at the ballot box last
November; Massachusetts and Connecticut are the only states which
currently give marriage licenses to homosexual couples.