Rich Lowry asks, "Who would you rather have a beer with? The conscientious guy, concerned with helping those around him? Or the oblivious guy, striding majestically alone?
Thomas Lifson, over at American Thinker writes:
I am stunned that the official White House Blog published this picture and that it is in the public domain. The body language is most revealing.
Sergeant Crowley, the sole class act in this trio, helps the handicapped Professor Gates down the stairs, while Barack Obama heedless of the infirmities of his friend and fellow victim of
self-defined racial profiling, strides ahead on his own. So who is
compassionate? And who is so self-involved and arrogant that he is oblivious?
In
my own dealings with the wealthy and powerful, I have always found that
the way to quickly capture the moral essence of a person is to watch
how they treat those who are less powerful. Do they understand that the
others are also human beings with feelings? Especially when they think
nobody is looking.
Hat tip: Rick Richman
Update from Thomas Lifson:
Update from Thomas Lifson:
I think this photo constitutes another major Obama blunder.
As
some AT commentators point out, this picture becomes a metaphor for
ObamaCare. The elderly are left in the back, with only the kindness of
the Crowleys of the world, the stand up guys, to depend on. The
government has other priorities.
One of the major subtexts of the health care debate involves the public's fear of indifferent, powerful bureaucrats
ruling their lives. It is one thing to wait in line at the DMV to find
out which other line you should wait in, in order to begin the process
of waiting for multiple bureaucrats to go through the motions of
processing your request. I have spent entire afternoons going through
this process.
But when we get to health care, waiting
often means enduring pain and dysfunction longer than necessary,
sometimes a worsening of the condition, and sometimes death.
That's
why I think this image will have genuine resonance. It captures
something that older Americans in particular can relate to. The
President presses ahead with a program that will tell them to take
painkillers instead of getting that artificial hip.
At
every stage of the entire Gates affair, Obama has provided a revealing
tell. The "acted stupidly" blunder revealed that he automatically
blames the police and thinks they really are stupid to begin with. It
didn't trigger a single alarm bell in his mind as he figured out what
to say.
Then, the non-apology apology revealed an arrogant man who cannot do what honest people do: admit it when they make a mistake.
Now at stage three, the beer photo op looked OK. It didn't turn into a disaster.
But then in a small moment that nobody in the White House had the brains to understand, Obama goes and send a body language message like this.
I
think he is going to get deeper and deeper into trouble. He is no
longer repeating the familiar scripts dreamed up for the campaign. He
was a master performer.
But when he goes improv, as a
president must do, he lets his true character show. This helps widen
the level of doubt that Obama is the same guy a majority voted for.
Those doubts can only grow.
Andrew McCarthy has assembled an overwhelming case
that Obama has lied about who he is. I predict that more and more
Americans will become open to the argument that they have been had by a
sophisticated and ruthless effort to foist a phony on America.