Levin says:
Whether the administration uses it enough or not I have no way of judging. But if there is no physical or even mid-term psychological damage, as many who've experienced it in training have told me, then what exactly is the objection? And if it's torture, how so? How do we define torture if a procedure that causes no physical or psychological damage is said to be torture?
Me: What are the answers to Levin's questions? If you run across them, please post.